Recommended practice for reporting experimental data produced from studies on corrosion of steel in cementitious systems


  • Burkan Isgor Oregon State University
  • Ueli Angst ETH Zurich
  • Mette Geiker
  • Ceki Halmen
  • Carolyn Hansson
  • Jose Pacheco
  • David Tepke
  • David Trejo
  • Pavan Vaddey



reinforcement, steel, corrosion, concrete, testing, pore solution, rebar, chloride


Experience has shown that many aspects of experimental design for studying steel corrosion in cementitious systems may significantly influence the obtained results. In the absence of standardized methods to study steel corrosion in concrete, researchers usually define their own test setups, which partially explains the large scatter and uncertainty in the aggregated published data. When the details of these setups are not provided adequately, experimental results cannot be interpreted in a wider context. Unfortunately, many scientific publications lack important experimental details. Therefore, this paper aims at improving the quality of reported experimental details, observations, and data in scientific publications, and raising awareness for relevant issues to improve the quality of research in the field. To this end, this paper provides a list of experimental details that have been found important by many decades of research, and which are, thus, recommended to be considered in conducting and reporting laboratory studies involving corrosion of steel embedded in cementitious systems. Finally, we propose a checklist for reporting experimental data in scientific publications.




How to Cite

Isgor, B.; Angst, U.; Geiker, M.; Halmen, C.; Hansson, C.; Pacheco, J.; Tepke, D.; Trejo, D.; Vaddey, P. Recommended Practice for Reporting Experimental Data Produced from Studies on Corrosion of Steel in Cementitious Systems. RILEM Tech Lett 2019, 4, 22-32.




Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)